Showing posts with label king. Show all posts
Showing posts with label king. Show all posts

Friday, 11 June 2010

Nigeria: Spousal abuse disgraces king


The deposition of a king
As there was much clamour what mattered was the aftermath of it all and it took almost a whole long two weeks to come, the result of which one cannot quibble about.
The Deji of Akure, Oba Oluwadare Adesina Adepoju, Osupa III, one of the paramount rulers of Yorubaland has been deposed [1], the constitutional arrangement in Nigeria is that a king rules by the blessing of his people but is answerable to the government of the day and in this case the state governor in which the kingdom exists.
Unwarranted aggression
The king was estranged from one of his many wives and with a gang of hoodlums visited the lady, poured noxious and caustic fluids over her and had her beaten up.
When the police attended the fracas, apart from separating the feuding couple and the bystanders who tried to placate the situation they took no particular action predicated on the excuse that it was a domestic spat.
End impunity and spousal abuse
Unfortunately, for the Oba, every local activity now seems to gain global scrutiny and the greater the odium the more the impetus for some action to be taken.
In this respect, two pertinent issues have come to the fore and it should be the beginning of a progressive and welcome situation in marital disputes.
A traditional king should regardless of the power and authority that he wields now realise that the rules of engagement with the community regardless of relationship can no more be one of megalomania aggravated with impunity without consequence – if necessary, the king shall be sanctioned and cannot be above the law – the premise of absolute monarchism is a fantasy at best.
A marital relationship even if estranged does not offer the cloak of exculpation in the event of spousal abuse, if matters cannot be resolved with dialogue then they cannot be resolved – to resort to violence because one has the power to mete out such would invite the full weight of the law, opprobrium and hopefully disgrace.
Societal change should come
The society must no more condone the prevalence of spousal abuse for marital dispute resolution, the law enforcement agencies must have their inclinations realigned to understand that physical abuse, violence, battering occasioning bodily harm cannot be absolved regardless of the causative issues.
The loud and clear message from this dethronement and banishment should be that nobody no matter how highly placed is above the law and when sanctioned for primitive acts like this all favours, dignities and respects would be revoked without redemption.
In disgrace as chapter is closed
One would think traditional rulers should be role models and paragons of uprightness, control, patience and comportment in the face of untenable circumstances – this example is despicable at best and an example should be made of this man with restitution including a profuse apology to the victim, his estranged wife, an apology to his people and at the risk of pre-empting the judicial process a custodial sentence with community service for these heinous sins.
It does make one wonder how a union that was at one time blissful and loving could have degenerated into a street brawl with such vengeful aggression – a king must keep his counsel with wisdom, long live the king but not with acts of impunity.
The people of Akure must hope that the next king would contrast greatly in demeanour and character from the hoodlum that one soiled the revered seat of the Deji of Akure, as for the reign of Osupa III, let the records show that it ended in disgrace, ignominy and shame.
Source

Thursday, 12 April 2007

Becoming persona non grata in Thailand

Most High Men

Now obviously this is skirting the realms of the unspeakable, untouchable and the incredible. Whilst I do have respect for monarchies and they do need to maintain an air of mystique about them, it becomes a bit much when these mere mortals who have assumed great power on earth get venerated as demi-gods and are accorded sacred virtues of holy unapproachable idols.

A typical scenario has been played out in Thailand where the much revered King Bhumibol Adulyadej Rama IX and ruler of over 60 years has been so feted.

An inebriated Swiss man resident in Thailand for over 10 years allowed his alcohol to get the better of him and went about defacing pictures commemorating the 79th birthday of the king.

That basically is vandalism in any general crime and punishment regime for which there should be some public order sanction.

Insulting the king

This however takes an interesting twist when the statute books contain a law that pertains to insulting a king, denigrating the name of a nation and identity or creating caricatures of seemingly revered figures of tradition or religion.

So, back in Thailand, the Swiss gets 10 years imprisonment for defacing pictures of the king, one does wonder what would have happened if he had defaced the statue of the king or worse still, gotten close to the king as to shout insults at the king.

In the 21st Century, it does not augur well for such societies to confer unassailable mystique and infallibility of any person to the point of benevolent deification.

It is shameful that one cannot criticise the king even constructively for the fear of overbearing lèse majesté laws that restrict free speech and curtail free expression thus protecting of some air of importance, dare I say, delusions of heavenly grandeur.

Taking offence unnecessarily

I do not think the critique of any person of importance, the defacement of a representation of a potentate or the refusal to genuflect to a monarch should constitute an offence, those who intend to be slighted can by their your will so be slighted but not by making an atrocious law to create an offence of the event.

One must not forget that royal influence was exerted in encouraging a military putsch that ousted a democratically elected regime that had quite a following amongst the Thai poor, the military rulers however have been cack-handed in handling the economy and made such of fuss of outlawing You-Tube for hosting material that made fun of the king.

Wasting the time of the king

In the end, the Swiss man received a royal pardon which is commendable but the situation is on the whole worsened because an inconsequential event in a Thailand backwater by a drunken foreigner went on to gain international prominence requiring the king exercise a prerogative because of a law that really should be struck off the books of any modern nation.

How this differs from the Turkish laws of insulting Turkishness or the legacy of Ataturk and the Muslim reaction to the Mohammedan cartoons with the fatwas that ensued would make interesting debate.

One suspects this is unlike other rulers who are cellophane skinned that they cannot brook any dissent and it is simply about courtiers trying to maintain the suffocating air of mystique around his majesty and by doing so heaping cause for opprobrium on the Thai people.

I guess these means I am persona non grata in Thailand.

References

Sensitive heads of state

Cellophane skinned lion hearts