The Mystery of Love
One thing I have
always held sacrosanct is not interfering in relationships. There is a complex
dynamic between people who choose and admire each other for all sorts of
reasons that outsiders may never be able to fathom.
The book of Proverbs
30:18-19 in the Bible informs me quite clearly, in the following words:
There are three things that amaze me—
no, four things that I don't understand:
how an eagle glides through the sky,
how a snake slithers on a rock,
how a ship navigates the ocean,
how a man loves a woman.
In the King James
Version, it is written as "and the way of a man with a maid."
In these times,
relationships are so diverse that the singularity of heterosexuality is no
longer the sole expression of love, nor the only way to choose a partner. The
way people choose whom they love, and why, will always remain a mystery.
Duty Rather Than
Spark
This is different
again from arranged settings, where external parties make the decisions that
the participants must adhere to. Familial, customary, societal, political, or
financial responsibilities usually influence such unions. People then have to
make the best of the cards they are dealt.
Arranged unions are
borne of duty, and the spark that arises out of attraction and leads to falling
in love hardly fits with this topic. I acknowledge that such unions exist, and
that affection may well develop within them over time, but that is a different
matter from autonomously finding love for oneself. My concern here is with
those who choose, not those who are chosen for.
When Love Turns to
Harm
Even where I have harboured misgivings about the suitability of a match, I have always been reluctant and reticent to express a view, except where abuse is evident, and a partner is endangered. By abuse, I mean both emotional abuse and domestic violence, for neither is conducive to a loving relationship, and both can lead to harm of different kinds, including fatalities.
People in such settings need
to be extricated before irreparable damage is caused. In those cases, there is
no reason to sacrifice the person to an age-old institution for the purpose of
saving face; the institution is not worth a life, nor the quiet erosion of one.
I am aware of the
difficulty in all of this, for it sits uneasily beside my own principle. If an
outsider cannot truly fathom why two people choose each other, that same
outsider can seldom read what passes behind their closed doors. Abuse is rarely
performed for an audience.
Harder still, the one
being harmed does not always recognise the harm; what others would name as
abuse can feel, from the inside, like an ordinary texture of the relationship.
There is also the matter of shame. To admit to being abused is to admit, as many
feel it, that one chose poorly, and so the stigma keeps people silent and keeps
them where they are. Choosing to leave is therefore rarely as simple as being
told to go.
None of this changes
my conclusion; it only tempers how I hold it. The exception for danger stands,
but it must be exercised with care, patience, and an honesty about how little
we can see.
Freedom to Love
Beyond that, you are
free to choose whom you want, and I bid you Godspeed that the companionship
will be happy, fulfilling, and wonderful. How a person loves another can only
be a thing of joy.
I appreciate that
there are people who would encounter great difficulty in understanding those
who deviate from the heteronormative, but that difficulty does not invalidate
the reality of it. Whether it is accepted or not, when one person meets another
for the affairs of the heart and falls in love, it is always between them, to
the exclusion of others.
A Hierarchy of
Choices
It is a hard
conversation that eventually has to be had: if your expectation of familial
ties is to be chosen over an intimate companion, you have read the situation
incorrectly. Once you understand the mystery that brings people together, you
fall into a hierarchy of choices. A partner will be chosen first, over all
other relationships, including close familial ties and long friendships. People
should fall in line and respect that choice, just as they would expect others
to respect their own.
What you will not get
away with, then, is disrespecting, disparaging, ignoring, or deigning to reduce
a significant other to insignificance. I know many will remain unpersuaded by
that construct, and so they will land in the irrelevant scheme of things.
Relationships are
acts of great determination on the part of the participants. The least that can
be done is to accord them the courtesy of acknowledging that they exist, and to
respect the one you know has chosen rightly for themselves.
In the end, this is
only a plea for individual choice and the respect it is owed, and for the
humility to accept that no one, however well-meaning, is equipped to choose
better on another's behalf.
Postscript
Ignore this at your
peril. The person who insists on knowing better, who meddles where they were
not invited and talks down to the one another has chosen, does not preserve the
relationship they disapprove of; they forfeit their place in it. You are not
owed a seat at a table you keep trying to overturn. Respect the choice, or be
left out of the life that choice builds.





