My Pages
Saturday, 28 September 2013
Nigeria: How much do we pay our lawmakers? - Part II
Tuesday, 6 August 2013
Nigeria: How much do we pay our lawmakers? - Part I
Friday, 30 October 2009
Nigeria: Lawmakers deliberate on the completely absurd
Originally written for NigeriansTalk.org as Lawmakers deliberate on the completely absurd.
No respect for the lawmaker
Sometimes I wonder why deliberations between lawmakers never get accorded any recognition of sophistication, erudition or plain sense.
It somehow never even gets to the level of a marketplace brawl in the heat of the day, the brutish entertainment of professional wrestling seems to have more decorum and order in its proceedings and eventual result – it is no wonder people might better watch a wrestling match than politicians politicking and preening themselves in self-absorbed discourse under the pretense of being representatives of some constituency.
That is the worrisome aspect of this line of thought, the fact that lawmakers are not seen in any good light and they then have the power to enact laws and legislation that affects our lives and livelihoods, it goes without saying that we need a better class of person first then better levels of deliberation.
A topic ready for debate
I have been reading comments to a news story in the good fatherland of Nigeria where lawmakers have deliberated the absurd, it is incredible that we end up with such representatives; these people do seriously believe they have raised serious concerns and their deliberations rather than being ridiculous are legitimate discourse.
The nEXt online newspaper carried and article with the headline Lawmakers ask robbers to declare temporary ceasefire [1], a headline like that should garner enough curiosity and interest, it did mine.
Nigeria is currently hosting the Under-17 Football World Cup, a competition that was almost pulled last year because the government could not see its obligation to follow through a commitment to host, the self-same government that is seeking a permanent seat on the UN Security Council – such is the myopia that plagues our leadership.
Appealing to the patriotism of bandits
Ogun State has one of the venues, so the lawmakers met up and first lamented that a particular location – Isheri Bridge on the border of Lagos and Ogun States had become a den of bandits.
Anyone would think once a hotspot for crime has been identified, you empower, equip and instruct the law enforcement agencies to sort it out and have a report at some future date as to how it was done and what else they need to be more effective at crime-fighting.
These politicians had a different line of thinking that could only be expressed verbatim, “there is a need for the men of the underworld to suspend their operations in the interim, because of the on-going mundial.”
Yes, our lawmakers were asking armed robbers to have a ceasefire, they should suspend their criminal activities to bolster and participate in the window dressing rebranding of Nigeria as a peaceful, crimeless and safe country.
Indeed, it is good to appeal to everyone’s sense of patriotism at a time like this, but this takes the absurd to another level crass stupidity, you cannot imagine anything worse can come after that appeal.
At the mercy of criminals
Well, it got worse, because the lawmaker went on to say, “Then they can resume thereafter, because there is nowhere in the world where robbers and robberies could be stopped from their work.”
One comment read, if this were a drama sketch, it would be unbelievable, the lines would be struck out, but this really happened, those words were spoken by an elected representative that had willfully suspended every iota of intellect.
In one sentence, they threw in the towel to crime, left us at the mercy of criminals and in that defeatist thinking equated robbery to some sort of gainful pursuit or employment.
Robbers and robberies do get stopped and many do end up being nabbed by the long arm of the law if law enforcement is given the tools, responsibility and confidence to do their job. However, this lawmaker and the chamber in which his remarks received shameless hearing and debate have undermined ever establishment and institution that might at one time have been able to combat this menace with all vigour and win.
So feeble, so delusional
To rub salt in insult into injury, he concluded his plea for support with, “If foreigners witness the robbers' attacks at this point, it would send a bad signal to other nations.” In my view, nothing could be worse than having this debate where the lawmakers have put us at the mercy and goodwill of men of the underworld and given the police no particular impetus to make order, safety and security prevail.
Then the Speaker of the House feebly suggested, “I want to use the opportunity to call on the police to intensify efforts in checkmating criminals. They should please not relent in the efforts.” How the police are expected to win the war on crime where the chess analogy leaves them so powerless as pawns and the armed robbers are all elevated to queens escapes me.
Much more hot air of words but no backbone or force of parliament to arrest an untenable situation; all this constituted a debate in a house of assembly.
Scanning through the comments left, it is clear that the Nigerian populace with an opinion are less than impressed by this and attribute this to the rot that has made politics an unpalatable mix of the nastiest people holding the reigns of power but completely clueless as to what being in power represents.
It is no wonder that they cannot even get a local government official to appear before them.
The danger is that this kind of deliberation is probably not an exception, but the norm in many other state assemblies, providing for chaos, drift and misgovernment – Nigerians need to talk about this kind of representation and deliberation, it should never become commonplace.
Source
[1] 234Next.com | Lawmakers ask robbers to declare temporary ceasefire
Monday, 12 May 2008
Nigeria: Leaving the objective for the subjective
Leaving the issue
This is probably a classic example of the issue I raised in my blog about the Senate Health Bill being rejected for having irregularities.
In that blog, I made the observation that generally Nigerians tend to leave behind the issue and pander around peripheral subjects that becloud the real matter at hand thereby losing the ability to objectively focus on what needs to be done.
No power for all the money
Nigeria has a serious energy crisis which is experienced by a majority through inadequate power supply; it would appear the last regime spent $16 billion according to some sources on building new power stations and fixing the transmission grid.
Nigeria produces 3,000 MW of electricity whilst it needs at least 8,000 MW, the Nigerian House of Representatives Committee on Power and Steel has been reviewing the numbers and contracts awarded having seen situations 18 turbines worth $3 billion are still at port because neither the government nor contractors have the means of moving the machines to their power station locations.
You are cordially invited …
Before concluding their report on their findings on the power contracts and why improvements do not seem to be commensurate with the moneys and contracts signed, the House Committee on Power and Steel, respectfully invited the former President Olusegun Obasanjo, his deputy, vice-President Atiku Abubakar and the former Minister of Finance Nenadi Usman to help understand the terms and circumstances of the contracts and what was expected for what was paid to fulfil those contracts.
Obasanjo and Atiku have offered to appear, Usman has been too chicken to appear at any of the committees to which she has been invited.
In general terms, if these people do have any information that would help us understand what was spent between $6.5 billion according to Obasanjo and any other figure of speculation, we would be glad to know why it has not yet resulted in improved power supplies or some other impediment to progress.
A legal clearance
The Nigerian Bar Association has been flipping the pages of the Nigerian Constitution and concluded that the legislature is within its rights of competence to invite, summons, issue a bench warrant or warrant the arrest of a citizen that refuses to heed its friendlier requests.
So, all should be in order for these people to respectfully present themselves to the committee and hopefully answer the questions they are asked so that the committee’s report might have a completeness that would allow us to move on to providing decent solutions for power.
Defending the indefensible
Well, not really, a group of lawmakers from the South West – read politicians driven by tribal instinct – have opposed the invitation to Obasanjo, criticising the committee for not seeking the backing of the principal officers of the House.
I think the committee already has the mandate of the House to review and investigate issues under their remit, if it includes inviting citizens no matter their previous status; they should not have to renew their mandate to invite individuals of interest to the committee.
They go on to argue that it is an act of disrespect to invite someone of Obasanjo’s status having served the country meritoriously as a past leader.
Well, I would contend, if he has served the country meritoriously, he should quite proudly and honourably be willing to defend and accentuate the good points of his service before any committee of properly constituted authority that might be seeking to get at the truth or attempting to impugn his service.
Obasanjo is already in the fray
Obasanjo may not have awarded the contracts but his regime should have had systems in place to monitor the progress of contracts and sanctions in place to exact against those who fail to deliver on the contracts.
Obasanjo himself has published information about what he spent on the power contracts which makes him a person of particular interest to answer questions on that matter – we should not be caught in the emotion of those lawmakers, the matter at stake is not about personalities, it is about questions that need answers that Obasanjo, Abubakar and Usman probably know a lot about.
Preserving a flawed status
The Nigerian Tribune which has an editorial remit that makes fawning sycophancy a prime art, suggests that Obasanjo and Abubakar might not appear before the committee.
Obasanjo, they say is being advised by his associates not to appear in order to preserve his status as former president – it makes you wonder if a former president of Nigeria does not come under that general collective term of citizen of Nigeria.
We are being regaled with due process talk of who should invite anyone between the Clerk of the House and the committee – it does not really matter to me, if the committee by a majority has decided to invite anyone, it just belabours process to have it contested by House officials.
But this is a clear example of people who are leaving the objective issue of obtaining answers to questions about power to peripheral subjective issues about status and respect – how that helps answer the questions escapes me and it does not help anyone – neither the summonsed parties nor Nigerians at large.

